October 30th, 2007
by NathanWe’re pulling the plug on Newshutch
Sorry we’ve been so quiet lately. We didn’t know when we be able to diagnose let alone fix things, and then, when we started thinking about shutting down, we wanted to be sure before we said anything.
We lost the hunger
The main problem we’ve been facing is that none of us were passionate about Newshutch anymore. Yes, the move to Joyent has been problematic1, but we’re glad it was because it forced us to face facts.
I sincerely believe that scrappy upstarts can upset and displace entrenched competitors. If we’ve learned nothing else from the last ten years it’s that creative destruction is alive and well.2
However, the key ingredient for the underdog is passion. We started working on Newshutch in early 2006 because we were scratching an itch. Like email clients, RSS clients make more sense as web applications. At the time the only big web based reader was Bloglines, and it remains unbelievably hideous to this day. These days however, to meaningfully compete with Google Reader, AND Bloglines, AND who knows how many other RSS readers, we’d have to do nothing else but work on Newshutch, and frankly, it wouldn’t be worth it. The problem of developing a usable web based RSS reader has been reasonably solved, so we’d rather pour ourselves into new projects where we could make a bigger impact.
No regrets
We thought it would be emotionally hard to shut down what we’d worked so hard on, but instead it’s liberating. Now we’re free to find new things to work on that will be even better than Newshutch.
One of the things that bothers me about Newshutch and other readers is that they?re great at hitting you with tons of information, but I’d rather be hit with the right information. Better still, I’d rather have tools to help me create things. Whatever we work on next will place a higher value on creation than consumption.
Another reason shutting down feels right is that it doesn’t feel like failure. We set out to make a newsreader that didn’t suck and we succeeded. Even better, we learned more about technology, design, project management, customer service, and business in one year than we would have in ten years at a normal job. At a typical job you’ve got an army of system administrators, marketers, and project managers, to back you up and nobody takes the heat when things go wrong. When you’re responsible for a live application from top to bottom you get smarter faster.
Even if you know you’ll fail (and you should always assume that you will) you should still try to build a product for yourself. Looking back it was almost hubris to attempt to build a newsreader (they’re very resource intensive), in Rails (Doug was a Java guy), with just two people, but we’re glad we did. We may have failed but what we’ve learned more than offsets any sting of failure.
What’s next?
Newshutch will shut down on November 10th. Before then, we’ll begin shutting down pieces of functionality until only OPML feed list export and account management remain. That should be enough time for you to migrate to other feed readers.3 The Newshutch blog will remain up indefinitely and we hope that you’ll stay subscribed to it because we’ve got a few more posts coming on the joys and pitfalls of building a web service. Also, we’ll announce future projects on the Newshutch blog (and at nathanbowers.com). Micah has already launched a new personal productivity service called Making the Chain, so be sure to check it out.
Thanks
Thanks to everyone who complained about, contributed to, commented on, and used Newshutch. That’s another hidden benefit to starting your own web service, you hear from all sorts of people, and usually they’re pretty cool. We’d still love to hear from you, so if any of you have ideas about what we should do with our codebase, or what you’d like to see us work on next, fire away in the comments.
- Joyent is a fine company with good service, but they weren’t right for us. This issue deserves its own post, but the bottom line is that Newshutch was too resource intensive for the three Accelerator slices we had, but to get enough Accelerators we’d end up paying more than we did for dedicated hosting. We weren’t in the Joyent sweet spot. If you start small with Joyent and scale up organically, that works fine. If you’re Twitter and have huge scaling needs and budget to match, also fine. If you are already up and running somwhere else, think long and hard before pulling up stakes to move to a new environment. Risking a move like that was a horrible decision on our part, but on the other hand I’m glad we did it because it forced us to make a decision about our future.
- See also: The entertainment industry vs. Apple, Detroit vs. Japan, IBM vs. Microsoft, Yahoo vs. Google, The Pony Express vs. the telegraph, etc…
- I still don’t really like any of the other readers out there. Google Reader seems to have the best functionality, but it’s just so damn ugly! Content viewed in a feed reader should be even easier to read than the feed publishers’ website, but every other web based feed reader botches design and typography so badly that it’s invariably worse. If I was Google I’d drive a cargo container of cash to 37signals’ or Dan Cederholm’s offices and say “Congrats, you’re the new EVP of UI at Google.” Since that probably won’t happen, your best bet is probably to use Google Reader with Jon Hicks’ theme.




A venture capital firm called today. It turns out that we’re not quite hot enough for VC investment yet.

